- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Cop stands up to gun nut in Texas.
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:56 pm to lsufan112001
Posted on 2/28/15 at 10:56 pm to lsufan112001
I have two issues.
1. The open carrier was a douche. Us cops deal with enough of them, no doubt.
2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".
Why?
Jones v. Clark
No. 09-3574 (7th Cir. 2011)
"...An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity when they detain an individual and can't point to a single circumstance that could have led them to believe an individual was engaged in criminal activity, nor that any federal or state law can justify the stop or support the view that the individual was committing a crime...."
1. The open carrier was a douche. Us cops deal with enough of them, no doubt.
2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".
Why?
Jones v. Clark
No. 09-3574 (7th Cir. 2011)
"...An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity when they detain an individual and can't point to a single circumstance that could have led them to believe an individual was engaged in criminal activity, nor that any federal or state law can justify the stop or support the view that the individual was committing a crime...."
2
Posted on 3/1/15 at 1:33 am to Five0
quote:
2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".
I agree, but when people start calling 911 to report the individual then police have to respond.
Posted on 3/1/15 at 3:54 am to Five0
quote:
I have two issues.
1. The open carrier was a douche. Us cops deal with enough of them, no doubt.
2. I don't agree with IDing someone for just "open carrying".
Why?
Jones v. Clark
No. 09-3574 (7th Cir. 2011)
"...An officer is not entitled to qualified immunity when they detain an individual and can't point to a single circumstance that could have led them to believe an individual was engaged in criminal activity, nor that any federal or state law can justify the stop or support the view that the individual was committing a crime....
What's the best way to handle this situation in your opinion? I think the officer stepped over the line when he legally detained him.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News