- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: 2015 NFL Mock Draft Database (Updated 4/17/15)
Posted on 2/26/15 at 1:39 am to WicKed WayZ
Posted on 2/26/15 at 1:39 am to WicKed WayZ
i'm kinda hoping for McKinney or Eric Kendricks from UCLA in the 2nd round?
I like McKinney more because he's a taller LB who seems like he can cover. Almost too good to be true. It pisses me off because we haven't drafted a LB very high in a long time.
Mark Fields.
1995.
1st round.
that aint right man... too long of a time. LB's are still important and McKinney seems like he fits the prototype for today's game?
I like McKinney more because he's a taller LB who seems like he can cover. Almost too good to be true. It pisses me off because we haven't drafted a LB very high in a long time.
Mark Fields.
1995.
1st round.
that aint right man... too long of a time. LB's are still important and McKinney seems like he fits the prototype for today's game?
This post was edited on 2/26/15 at 1:42 am
Posted on 2/26/15 at 2:49 am to LooseCannon22282
I've soured on McKinney. I think he can be a solid LB in the league, just not what we need. He's the least instinctive LB in the main top group (Perryman, Dawson, Kendricks, Anthony). His coverage skills are probably the worst out of all five of them. Not saying he's terrible in coverage just the most sub-par. Sure he's got the athleticism and body scouts drool over but I see him as more of a thumper.
I still like what I see from Dawson. His tape >>>> his combine. He plays with a way faster and is highly instinctive - he just knows where to be and gets there. I read somewhere called him "functionally athletic" and I think that fits him perfect. He's not a track star but his talents translate onto the field. Plus with his combine we might be able to get him in the 2nd if were lucky but I doubt it. I still have faith he can undo the damage he did at the combine on his pro day.
If I had to rank them considering what the Saints need out of a LB and the potential value of where we'd be able to pick them (so one LB could be "better" but a similar talent could be had later or fit better so I'd rank them higer) I'd say my rankings would be:
Dawson
Anthony
Kendricks
McKinney
Perryman
I still like what I see from Dawson. His tape >>>> his combine. He plays with a way faster and is highly instinctive - he just knows where to be and gets there. I read somewhere called him "functionally athletic" and I think that fits him perfect. He's not a track star but his talents translate onto the field. Plus with his combine we might be able to get him in the 2nd if were lucky but I doubt it. I still have faith he can undo the damage he did at the combine on his pro day.
If I had to rank them considering what the Saints need out of a LB and the potential value of where we'd be able to pick them (so one LB could be "better" but a similar talent could be had later or fit better so I'd rank them higer) I'd say my rankings would be:
Dawson
Anthony
Kendricks
McKinney
Perryman
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News