- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Spidey aint gonna be a whitey
Posted on 2/23/15 at 9:27 am to BaddestAndvari
Posted on 2/23/15 at 9:27 am to BaddestAndvari
quote:
P.S: Miles Morales is Donald Glover, you can all die.
I could get behind them casting Glover as Morales since Glover was basically the inspiration for Morales. That would be a homerun casting decision in my book.
The only problem with using Morales instead of Peter is that the non-"die hard" comic folks would be totally confused as to why Spiderman isn't Peter Parker. I guess they could spend the first part of the movie explaining why Morales has taken up the mantel or something. But it could still be a risky move to not use Peter Parker from a money making standpoint.
2
Posted on 2/23/15 at 9:31 am to Bamatab
quote:
The only problem with using Morales instead of Peter is that the non-"die hard" comic folks would be totally confused as to why Spiderman isn't Peter Parker. I guess they could spend the first part of the movie explaining why Morales has taken up the mantel or something. But it could still be a risky move to not use Peter Parker from a money making standpoint.
I have no problem with Morales being Spiderman. I have no problem with Morales being Blatino. I have no problem with Spiderman being Blatino. I have a problem with Peter Parker being Blatino. Simply because he isnt.
Posted on 2/23/15 at 1:18 pm to Bamatab
quote:
The only problem with using Morales instead of Peter is that the non-"die hard" comic folks would be totally confused as to why Spiderman isn't Peter Parker. I guess they could spend the first part of the movie explaining why Morales has taken up the mantel or something. But it could still be a risky move to not use Peter Parker from a money making standpoint.
Parker reveals himself as Spiderman in Civil War.
Then in a stand alone true reboot, he is killed early in the movie and MM is introduced. Going forward MM is spiderman in the avengers.
I'd have no problem with that.
It's a great way to tie Spidey into Civil War, kill off the non Marvel spidey movie universe, and bring the casual fan and current universe up to snuff.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News