Started By
Message

re: Another 1911 Thread

Posted on 2/23/15 at 7:38 am to
Posted by dnm3305
Member since Feb 2009
13611 posts
Posted on 2/23/15 at 7:38 am to
Strictly speaking on functionality and reliability and to answer the OP's question, no you cannot justifiably spend the extra $700 on the Kimber and improve that drastic in performance. I would get the Ruger and spend the rest on ammo (or get two Rugers ). You will be very happy with the SR1911, but you would also be very happy with the Kimber.
Posted by GaryMyMan
Shreveport
Member since May 2007
13498 posts
Posted on 2/23/15 at 8:27 am to
Or a Ruger and a H&K VP9.

After firing somewhere north of 1,000 rounds from my Ruger SR1911C I really can't see how or why people love to spend so much money on 1911's. Aside from aesthetic touches like bobtails and beavertails and any other tails you want to throw on there I just couldn't justify it. I'm a pretty awful shot, historically, but I can drive nails with the Ruger at a reasonable distance. I can appreciate the lightness of the S&W Bapple posted, but the new aluminum frame Ruger matches it for $600 less.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram