- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Watching 300 for the 1st time
Posted on 2/12/15 at 8:04 pm to DanglingFury
Posted on 2/12/15 at 8:04 pm to DanglingFury
quote:
it looks cool as hell
Why I don't like the second one. It had lost that effect, seemed like a lot of very noticeable cgi. Maybe they were too far spaced out
1
Posted on 2/12/15 at 9:19 pm to HeadChange
quote:
Why I don't like the second one. It had lost that effect, seemed like a lot of very noticeable cgi. Maybe they were too far spaced out
They didn't use the same "Crush' effect on the second film, that technique was created and used on the first to give the film its unique look.
Probably because the second film had a different director and cinematographer.
300- Zack Snyder director, Larry Fong cinematographer
300 Rise of an Empire- Noam Murro director, Simon Duggan cinematographer
Page 1 of 1
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News