- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Sling TV Releases Sports Package - $5 Per Month
Posted on 2/6/15 at 12:14 pm to taylork37
Posted on 2/6/15 at 12:14 pm to taylork37
You would be paying way more than $2 per channel.
The only reason channels are as cheap as they are per subscriber is because of how many subscribers there are.
If everything was a la carte, subscribers for an individual channel would go WAY down.
The only reason channels are as cheap as they are per subscriber is because of how many subscribers there are.
If everything was a la carte, subscribers for an individual channel would go WAY down.
2
Posted on 2/6/15 at 12:15 pm to PrimeTime Money
Thy is Sling deal is pretty good, but it is as cheap as it is because they already make so much money with regular cable and satellite.
If the whole system was a la carte, this Sling deal wouldn't be possible at the price it is.
They are trying to pick up the relatively few who have already cut the cord who otherwise wouldn't be paying them.
If the whole system was a la carte, this Sling deal wouldn't be possible at the price it is.
They are trying to pick up the relatively few who have already cut the cord who otherwise wouldn't be paying them.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 12:16 pm
Posted on 2/6/15 at 12:36 pm to PrimeTime Money
quote:
You would be paying way more than $2 per channel.
I understand that, but that matters little if I am only paying $20. I am willing to pay more per channel to just have those channels.
quote:
The only reason channels are as cheap as they are per subscriber is because of how many subscribers there are.
If channels are $2 a piece then wouldn't it take less subscribers to reclaim the same margins?
quote:
If everything was a la carte, subscribers for an individual channel would go WAY down.
I don't want everything a la carte. Just give me less crap. Give me those 10 stations offered by Sling and I will pay you more per station. Its simple. I am now paying $80 for 90 channels that I don't watch.
Even I only watch 7 out of those 10 channels offered I am still saving money.
This post was edited on 2/6/15 at 12:39 pm
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News