- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Paul Finebaum says LSU got short end of stick...
Posted on 1/29/15 at 10:35 am to RB10
Posted on 1/29/15 at 10:35 am to RB10
The players we had were a big factor in the success of those defenses. Chavis is good but he lost us some games with his 3rd and Chavis playcalling. It was time for a change.
2
Posted on 1/29/15 at 10:38 am to jrowla2
quote:
The players we had were a big factor in the success of those defenses. Chavis is good but he lost us some games with his 3rd and Chavis playcalling. It was time for a change
I've been adamant that Chavis' success was based largely on having top talent because his scheme is very basic. However, he's proven that his scheme works, particularly against spread offenses. Steele, not so much.
It may have been time for a change, but Steele is still a pretty big step down from Chavis. Hopefully he proves me wrong, but his previous stops don't give me a lot of optimism.
Posted on 1/29/15 at 3:12 pm to jrowla2
quote:
Chavis is good but he lost us some games with his 3rd and Chavis playcalling.
i've watched the same games everyone else has and have little doubt there is something to "3rd and Chavis".
but are there any stats to proving Chavis led defenses are prone to allowing longer gains on 3rd down vs. National Averages.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News