Started By
Message

re: Why didn't we rest Jimmy Graham when injured?

Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:07 pm to
Posted by goatman1419
Prairieville,LA
Member since Jan 2007
3070 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

https://www.canalstreetchronicles.com/2014/4/28/5658948/saints-jimmy-graham-tight-end-roundtable


LINK

Just Google is Jimmy Graham soft and look at the pages of articles debating this topic. Then Google is Gronk soft.......see any difference?? Seems alot of people bring up the soft subject only about Graham. But I'm sure you could say all these writers, NFL players, scouts and many average fans they are laughable and make it all go away.
Posted by TigerBait1127
Houston
Member since Jun 2005
47336 posts
Posted on 2/2/15 at 7:11 pm to
Seattle talked shite about Gronk too

quote:

“I actually don’t think he’s that good,” Lane said. “He’s OK.”

Gronkowski, a two-time All-Pro, caught 82 passes for 1,124 yards and 12 touchdowns on the season, rebounding from a 2013 season where he missed nine games due to injury. But Lane said that he thought the key to stopping the 6-foot-6, 265-pounder was getting physical with him.

“He does have a big body,” Lane said, “but from what I’ve seen on tape, he doesn’t like you putting your hands on him. So if we put our hands on him and shake him up a little big, he won’t catch that many balls.”




Didn't the players vote him in the top 10 of all players last year?

LINK

Anyways, I'm out. Nothing I say will change your mind when you make statements like this:

quote:

Again it's laughable to use the pressure as a reason to say its the reason his int numbers are so high



Enjoy Prairieville

This post was edited on 2/2/15 at 7:16 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram