Started By
Message

re: Would any of you recommend a Ruger Mark III as a first handgun purchase?

Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:54 pm to
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
167020 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:54 pm to
This is a cheap gun that he should spend as little as possible to get into a real gun
Posted by DownSouthDave
Beau, Bro, Baw
Member since Jan 2013
7396 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 6:57 pm to
$270 is already mighty cheap. And just because it's a starter pistol that's inexpensive doesn't mean he should completely cheap out on it.
Posted by TigerOnThe Hill
Springhill, LA
Member since Sep 2008
6833 posts
Posted on 1/27/15 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

This is a cheap gun that he should spend as little as possible to get into a real gun


There's nothing CHEAP nor UNREAL about any of the guns the OP has mentioned possibly buying. :roll eyes:

quote:

You NEED this if you get a mark III or 22/45.

No ya don't. I've broken down my Mk 1 only 1-2 times. It's not something that needs to be done regularly. Just run a Bore Snake down the barrel and clean the action w/ CLP and you'll be fine.
This post was edited on 1/27/15 at 11:20 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram