Started By
Message

re: Straight to DVD movies: The hell is up with that?

Posted on 1/25/15 at 11:50 am to
Posted by Dodgson
Member since Feb 2012
722 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 11:50 am to
quote:

distribution via theaters is expensive as frick, so likely not


Yeah. It's way easier to make money off of DVD's and TV showings than having do deal will the bazillion costs involved in having to distribute it to theaters. If your movie doesn't have a lot of star power and your studio has another movie it is more interested in putting on the rounds in the theater, then it makes sense to go straight-to-video. Especially if it is part of a franchise that has a name that would probably sell. The only cost there is producing the DVD/Blu-Ray, and in the case of TV showings you're pretty much raking in the ad revenue. I'm not sure about the in-and-outs of Netflix but I assume there is significant profit potential there as well. Entire companies are able to operate this way.
Posted by gatorprincess815
Founder of Tim Tebow Fan Club.
Member since Jul 2009
18452 posts
Posted on 1/25/15 at 2:09 pm to
I didn't even know they had part 2,3, and now 4. Where have I been?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram