- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Why can't the Green Bay Packers ownership model get embraced?
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:21 pm
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:21 pm
As I understand it, they are really the only professional sports franchise that is allowed to have the model of local citizens basically owning shares in the franchise. Why them and nobody else?
Thinking about this coming Benson shitstorm (and others from other franchises in their successions over the years), has me wondering why sports leagues wouldn't want to embrace this as an ownership model. Anyone?
Thinking about this coming Benson shitstorm (and others from other franchises in their successions over the years), has me wondering why sports leagues wouldn't want to embrace this as an ownership model. Anyone?
9
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:22 pm to Y.A. Tittle
B/c pro sports teams in the US say frick not being able to hold cities hostage for new facilities via threat of moving.
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:22 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Ego and money.
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:23 pm to Y.A. Tittle
because socialism
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:24 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Them and the Celtics. Grandfathered in, both of them. Not sure why. OT Ballers know all about this stuff. Maybe one of them can come here and explain.
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:24 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Because rich guys like owning sports teams and the league likes them driving the price up.
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:28 pm to Y.A. Tittle
Because this is fricking gay...
quote:
Even though it is referred to as "common stock" in corporate offering documents, a share of Packers stock does not share the same rights traditionally associated with common or preferred stock. It does not include an equity interest, does not pay dividends, can not be traded, has no securities-law protection,[citation needed], and brings no season ticket purchase privileges. All shareholders receive are voting rights, an invitation to the corporation's annual meeting, and an opportunity to purchase exclusive shareholder-only merchandise. Shares of stock cannot be resold, except back to the team for a fraction of the original price. While new shares can be given as gifts, transfers are technically allowed only between immediate family members once ownership has been established.
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:32 pm to Y.A. Tittle
who actually makes money from the packers?
Posted on 1/22/15 at 3:35 pm to Y.A. Tittle
I believe their team has a board of directors that actually work for the Packers. They make the money that the owners would make. Those shares don't mean anything. 
Posted on 1/22/15 at 5:36 pm to Y.A. Tittle
The shares sold to the public literally mean nothing
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News