Started By
Message

re: Frank Wilson reaction on the hires

Posted on 1/15/15 at 9:09 am to
Posted by TheCaterpillar
Member since Jan 2004
76774 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 9:09 am to
The "full recruiting" staff failed badly at Clemson.

I do think we have a much better group of position coaches and a team philosophy that will be more conducive to a quality defense. And more talent.

We'll see what happens, but this DC hire on paper is bad. Orgeron really helps the blow, but his energy and recruiting can only go so far with a bad game plan.

We will see though.
Posted by SlowFlowPro
Simple Solutions to Complex Probs
Member since Jan 2004
423961 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 9:23 am to
oh i agree

somebody asked a rhetorical question when there was a concrete answer. it's just funny that there is an overlap, and it's steele
Posted by BigEdLSU
All around the south
Member since Sep 2010
20268 posts
Posted on 1/15/15 at 9:45 am to
How good were we though? This entire ordeal makes me consider new things.

For one, we have had poor prioritization of needs, defensively. In 2012 we take 7 linebackers? Followed and proceeded by lackluster classes at the position. This year we need DL, and only had one committed?

Second, how much does our ball control offense help our defensive stats? Probably a lot.

Third, how complex was the scheme? It took chavis an average of three years to prepare linebackers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram