- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I heard layoffs happened at Schlumberger today
Posted on 1/13/15 at 8:07 pm to Swoopin
Posted on 1/13/15 at 8:07 pm to Swoopin
I don't know why you're explaining it to me. I'm well versed in the O&G industry. I had family with a lot on the line in this industry.
There are going to be stupid people making huge cash & subsequently spending it like it would last forever; they aren't bright. That's understood from my end.
My question is why are non-O&G people seemingly often upset about O&G highs when they are also more likely to experience the associated lows of a volatile industry? There are a good number on here who are upset at these "such vastly overpaid salaries" but conversely are so quick to tell people to pound sand when things aren't going well.
Risk/reward & all that. Those that can effectively manage the risk associated with the O&G industry should reap higher profits than less volatile & risky industries.
There are going to be stupid people making huge cash & subsequently spending it like it would last forever; they aren't bright. That's understood from my end.
My question is why are non-O&G people seemingly often upset about O&G highs when they are also more likely to experience the associated lows of a volatile industry? There are a good number on here who are upset at these "such vastly overpaid salaries" but conversely are so quick to tell people to pound sand when things aren't going well.
Risk/reward & all that. Those that can effectively manage the risk associated with the O&G industry should reap higher profits than less volatile & risky industries.
This post was edited on 1/13/15 at 8:10 pm
Posted on 1/13/15 at 9:27 pm to Louie T
My responses are contributions to the topic moreso than direct responses to you. I'm pretty sure we completely 100% agree and are somehow going back and forth over it . Like those 2 UF players blocking eachother last year.
ETA:
However I do have the differing opinion that oil has been priced above its rightful equilibrium for some time. Sure we agree that there is a volatility risk/reward that the industry takes, I just happen to think the average point in the wave should be lower than it has been.
Most of the volatility has to do with stagnant demand/recession. This particular dip has to do with Saudis hopping off industry bandwagon and letting her rip. I think this correction is a little more telling/honest than most.
ETA:
However I do have the differing opinion that oil has been priced above its rightful equilibrium for some time. Sure we agree that there is a volatility risk/reward that the industry takes, I just happen to think the average point in the wave should be lower than it has been.
Most of the volatility has to do with stagnant demand/recession. This particular dip has to do with Saudis hopping off industry bandwagon and letting her rip. I think this correction is a little more telling/honest than most.
This post was edited on 1/13/15 at 9:32 pm
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News