Started By
Message

re: Question for uncircumcised guys

Posted on 1/10/15 at 7:01 pm to
Posted by vjp819
South Sec. 414 / Alex Box Sec. 210
Member since Nov 2003
10882 posts
Posted on 1/10/15 at 7:01 pm to
quote:

I'm almost positive it feels better for women. Foreskin movement allows for a lot less friction. Not to mention it's more pleasurable for uncircumcised guys considering they still have the nerve endings that get chopped off during circumcision.


I have one argument with this. Not particularly this post because I've seen this mentioned many times.
1. Feels better for the guy? If fricking the inside of your foreskin feels better then fricking a pussy, you'd know that better then I would. I don't believe it though.

2. Feels better for the woman (less friction)?
Well yeah if you are fricking her a-hole, because if she's interested at all, she's plenty wet enough that friction is not an issue. If friction is a problem then all I can say is a wet pussy, or a dry pussy don't lie.
I'll hang up and listen.
Posted by Chadzilla
Houma
Member since Feb 2014
632 posts
Posted on 1/10/15 at 7:35 pm to
It feels better for the guy because the head is more sensitive. Also, the foreskin is not covering the head while your dick is hard. Your actual head touches the inside of the vagina.

The uncircumcised penis was made for the vagina. It has more give than a circumcised one it's not just like a stick being shoved back and forth into a vagina. They actually move together and it just seems like it would make for a much more pleasant experience.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram