- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: United, Orbitz sue man publicizing loophole to get cheaper airfares
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:13 am to RedRifle
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:13 am to RedRifle
Comment by American Airlines
quote:
“Purchasing a ticket to a point beyond the actual destination and getting off the aircraft at the connecting point is unethical,” according to the letter by American, which isn’t party to the case. “It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:19 am to fatboydave
quote:
“Purchasing a ticket to a point beyond the actual destination and getting off the aircraft at the connecting point is unethical,” according to the letter by American, which isn’t party to the case. “It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
Is it really though, when the airlines are offering the lower prices themselves? I'd say it's more like a coffee shop only showing the price of a small coffee, but you buy the large size which actually costs less, then you don't finish it.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:20 am to fatboydave
quote:
“It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
No it's not.
It's comparable to buying a 44 oz drink at Circle K because it's $.10 less than the 22 oz. drink and you don't feel bad about throwing away the last 1/4 of it if you don't finish it all.
This post was edited on 12/30/14 at 10:20 am
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:20 am to fatboydave
quote:
Comment by American Airlines
quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“Purchasing a ticket to a point beyond the actual destination and getting off the aircraft at the connecting point is unethical,” according to the letter by American, which isn’t party to the case. “It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
What a stupid analogy.
Wouldn't it be like wanting to buy a new video game, so you go to the store. The store has the video game for $60. But over on this shelf, they have the same exact video game, plus an additional controller, for $45. So you buy the $45 package so you could get the game for cheaper even though you didn't need the controller.
Isn't that more accurate?
I'm interested to see which way the court leans on this..
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:27 am to fatboydave
quote:
It is tantamount to switching price tags t
Tantamount??? I'll show them whats TANTAMOUNT!
Posted on 12/30/14 at 10:33 am to fatboydave
quote:
“It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
This dumb analogy would equate to buying a ticket from BR to Dallas but getting on a flight headed to Hawaii once you got to the BR airport.
Posted on 12/30/14 at 12:13 pm to fatboydave
quote:
Purchasing a ticket to a point beyond the actual destination and getting off the aircraft at the connecting point is unethical,” according to the letter by American, which isn’t party to the case. “It is tantamount to switching price tags to obtain a lower price on goods sold at department stores.”
This is bullshite. It is the same as needing 10 of something but buying 12 is cheaper and throwing the last 2 away. Now the manufacture is mad because 2 got wasted.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News