Started By
Message

re: Why I've always thought the opposition to 18-game NFL sked is dishonest

Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:20 am to
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84484 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:20 am to
quote:

Why? Why not just quote me directly?


I already did in a previous post.

ETA: And since I apparently gave you too much credit for remembering half a page of posts ago, here it is again:

quote:

quote:

If a starter sits out one series per football game, he'll play about the same number of snaps in an 18-game schedule as he does currently.



You have to be trolling to keep trotting out this utterly retarded "logic." Surely you can't be this stupid, can you?

But let's pretend you're serious. Carrying your "logic" further, apparently you think sitting out one series per game over 18 regular season games would have an equal effect for a player's body's healing process as sitting out for two consecutive weeks. Do you actually think this?

This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:25 am
Posted by ballscaster
Member since Jun 2013
26861 posts
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:56 am to
Please grind the ax elsewhere. I said it isn't unfair. That's my only point.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram