- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why I've always thought the opposition to 18-game NFL sked is dishonest
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:20 am to ballscaster
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:20 am to ballscaster
quote:
Why? Why not just quote me directly?
I already did in a previous post.
ETA: And since I apparently gave you too much credit for remembering half a page of posts ago, here it is again:
quote:quote:
If a starter sits out one series per football game, he'll play about the same number of snaps in an 18-game schedule as he does currently.
You have to be trolling to keep trotting out this utterly retarded "logic." Surely you can't be this stupid, can you?
But let's pretend you're serious. Carrying your "logic" further, apparently you think sitting out one series per game over 18 regular season games would have an equal effect for a player's body's healing process as sitting out for two consecutive weeks. Do you actually think this?
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 9:25 am
Posted on 12/22/14 at 9:56 am to LNCHBOX
Please grind the ax elsewhere. I said it isn't unfair. That's my only point.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)