- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: White people feeling the pangs of change
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:24 am to baybeefeetz
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:24 am to baybeefeetz
quote:
How am I? Risk and result are two different things. If the prosecutor sees the negligence issue as I do, he should not have indicted. Plain and simple. This whole thing was on video. There is no dispute of fact.
You are implying he didn't die from the chest or neck compression. If you're not implying that, you're just speaking nonsense.
Posted on 12/22/14 at 12:31 am to the808bass
Then you are just not following me, because I am being very clear here, as I have in the past on this topic. if I am on that grand jury and I see that video, even after I am told that nypd bans chokeholds, I don't find probable cause for negligence. Common sense tells you that yhe chance of death arising from that physical contact is very low. We as modern Americans have seen that kind of contact many, many times, not resulting in death. Negligence is about common sense.
There are chokeholds that clearly pose a greater risk. Here, the very low percentage chance of death panned out. That's all.
There are chokeholds that clearly pose a greater risk. Here, the very low percentage chance of death panned out. That's all.
This post was edited on 12/22/14 at 12:34 am
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News