- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: SCOTUS says its ok for cops to be ignorant of the law in their duties
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:35 pm to swamplynx
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:35 pm to swamplynx
quote:
Yea, but what people are pissed about is that he was pulled over when he shouldn't have been. This ruling is nothing new like another poster said.
I get that, but cops make BS stops all the time when the actually know the law. This is one of the few times where the cop wasn't intentionally trying to screw someone.
quote:
The hipocracy that the government can claim ignorance but the public can't is what is frustrating.
I don't think they are saying his ignorance excuses anything, I think they are saying that his ignorance doesnt invalidate the search and arrest, which is true because the idiot driver gave consent to search.
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 1:36 pm
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:09 pm to ZereauxSum
quote:
I think they are saying that his ignorance doesnt invalidate the search and arrest, which is true because the idiot driver gave consent to search.
This is exactly what they are saying. But, the controversy is that he wouldn't have been pulled over in the first place but for the cops ignorance of the actual law. The article is focusing on this issue not the actual consent to search.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News