Started By
Message

re: SCOTUS says its ok for cops to be ignorant of the law in their duties

Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:35 pm to
Posted by ZereauxSum
Lot 23E
Member since Nov 2008
10176 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 1:35 pm to
quote:

Yea, but what people are pissed about is that he was pulled over when he shouldn't have been. This ruling is nothing new like another poster said.


I get that, but cops make BS stops all the time when the actually know the law. This is one of the few times where the cop wasn't intentionally trying to screw someone.

quote:

The hipocracy that the government can claim ignorance but the public can't is what is frustrating.


I don't think they are saying his ignorance excuses anything, I think they are saying that his ignorance doesnt invalidate the search and arrest, which is true because the idiot driver gave consent to search.
This post was edited on 12/18/14 at 1:36 pm
Posted by swamplynx
Lake Chuck
Member since Oct 2014
1240 posts
Posted on 12/18/14 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

I think they are saying that his ignorance doesnt invalidate the search and arrest, which is true because the idiot driver gave consent to search.



This is exactly what they are saying. But, the controversy is that he wouldn't have been pulled over in the first place but for the cops ignorance of the actual law. The article is focusing on this issue not the actual consent to search.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram