Started By
Message

re: Success on field compared to recruiting

Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:28 pm to
Posted by inadaze
Member since Aug 2010
4865 posts
Posted on 12/17/14 at 2:28 pm to
quote:

1a. Missouri (3 10-win Seasons, 2 SECe Titles)
1b. Vanderbilt (James Franklin)
3a. Alabama (Hard to overachieve when you have 7 straight #1 classes)
3b. South Carolina (3 11-win seasons, 1 SECe Titles)
5a. Mississippi State (Average SEC team with Average Recruiting Ranks)
5b. LSU (4 10-win Seasons, 1 SEC Title, 1 NC appearance, Trails only Bama, Oregon, and Stanford for total results)
7. aTm (3 9-win Seasons)
8. Arkansas (Fired a Coach)
9. Georgia
10. Florida (Fired a Coach)
11. Auburn (Fired a Coach)
12. Kentucky (Fired a Coach)
13. Ole Miss (Fired a Coach)
14. Tennessee (Fired a Coach)


Table 1 gives an exact number -- the Diff -- for the Aggregate on-field and recruiting ratings, so I don't think the letters are necessary.

quote:

A negative "Diff" means teams "underperformed" their recruiting. A positive "Diff" means they "outperformed" their recruiting.


1. Missouri (6.1)
2. Vanderbilt (5)
3. Alabama (1.2)
4. South Carolina (0.4)
5. Mississippi St. (-0.3)
6. LSU (-2.8)
7. Texas A&M (-3.1)
8. Arkansas (-7.1)
9. Georgia (-16)
10. Auburn (-17.6)
11. Florida (-20.3)
12. Kentucky (-25.8)
13. Mississippi (-30.3)
14. Tennessee (-40.4)
This post was edited on 12/17/14 at 2:32 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram