- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is hockey as violent as football?
Posted on 12/17/14 at 8:29 am to pvilleguru
Posted on 12/17/14 at 8:29 am to pvilleguru
Hockey has hits but doesnt require hits. The rules of football dictate someone has to get hit. Its more violent.
Anyone who says aussie rules/rugby need to understand that not having pads doesnt make it more violent. It makes it less violent. The hits are overwhelmingly less violent because the guy delivering them is unprotected.
I think the answer, given my definition of violence, is probably MMA, then Boxing, then Football.
Anyone who says aussie rules/rugby need to understand that not having pads doesnt make it more violent. It makes it less violent. The hits are overwhelmingly less violent because the guy delivering them is unprotected.
I think the answer, given my definition of violence, is probably MMA, then Boxing, then Football.
1
Posted on 12/17/14 at 12:21 pm to Hester Carries
Yeah, I played some rugby and high school football. Football is more violent bc the equipment allows it to be.
But obviously boxing /MMA are more violent
But obviously boxing /MMA are more violent
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News