- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How is Big 12 adding Memphis/Cincy any different than B1G adding Marylnd/Rutgers
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:21 pm to goldennugget
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:21 pm to goldennugget
Maryland and Rutgers are AAU universities with an extremely strong research profile that fits into the ethos of the Big 10. They may not have extensive football histories, but the rest of their athletic programs are a good fit. Plus, their football teams are certainly competitive with the current level of play in the Big 10. Most importantly, they nailed down important TV markets in Washington/Baltimore and NJ/Philly.
You're right that some of the teams that have been mentioned for the Big 12 (like BYU, UCF, and Boise) wouldn't water down the league in terms of football. However, there are additional considerations. Do the current Big 12 schools want to send their non-revenue sports to Provo, Boise, and Orlando? That's a lot of money. UCF and Memphis may provide an entry into an excellent recruiting market, but few of the other schools do. Can the other universities bring anything to the table in terms of research prestige? We like to pretend this doesn't matter, but it matters a great deal to the presidents and boards approving these conference moves. Some of the universities for the Big 12 that have been mentioned provide a strong undergraduate education, but none have a strong graduate school/research reputation.
These decisions have a lot of moving variables. That's why the Big 12 is reluctant to move immediately.
You're right that some of the teams that have been mentioned for the Big 12 (like BYU, UCF, and Boise) wouldn't water down the league in terms of football. However, there are additional considerations. Do the current Big 12 schools want to send their non-revenue sports to Provo, Boise, and Orlando? That's a lot of money. UCF and Memphis may provide an entry into an excellent recruiting market, but few of the other schools do. Can the other universities bring anything to the table in terms of research prestige? We like to pretend this doesn't matter, but it matters a great deal to the presidents and boards approving these conference moves. Some of the universities for the Big 12 that have been mentioned provide a strong undergraduate education, but none have a strong graduate school/research reputation.
These decisions have a lot of moving variables. That's why the Big 12 is reluctant to move immediately.
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:35 pm to MikeyFL
How could anybody compare to city Universities to the two state Universities? All the above facts are spot on. Cable TVS for Rutgers and Maryland expand the Big ten foot print. hell I got the Big ten network near New York City due to Rutgers and yes I watched. Couldn't get SEC here though
Posted on 12/9/14 at 2:41 pm to MikeyFL
quote:
Maryland and Rutgers are AAU universities with an extremely strong research profile that fits into the ethos of the Big 10. They may not have extensive football histories, but the rest of their athletic programs are a good fit. Plus, their football teams are certainly competitive with the current level of play in the Big 10. Most importantly, they nailed down important TV markets in Washington/Baltimore and NJ/Philly.
MikeyFl,
This very well stated.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News