- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Let's talk Nate Washington
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:55 am to GynoSandberg
Posted on 12/7/14 at 10:55 am to GynoSandberg
Mett had been good for 20 completions. I'm having a tough time splitting them up without Nate getting at least 5 of them.
1
Posted on 12/7/14 at 11:03 am to Toula
I just know he has accounted for zero 100 yard WRs and no WR has been worth a shite with Mett under center. I see what you're saying based on sheer volume, but I just dont know if now if the time to get cute.
I would rather start a Bailey, a Moncrief, a Chuck Johnson type instead of a Washington.
I would rather start a Bailey, a Moncrief, a Chuck Johnson type instead of a Washington.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News