Started By
Message

re: Not Long Ago, Art Briles Didn't Think Head-to-Head Mattered

Posted on 12/7/14 at 5:36 am to
Posted by Eden
Member since Nov 2014
477 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 5:36 am to
This is dumb.

The 2008 B12 had a 3-way tie among Texas, Oklahoma and Texas Tech for the division with all three owning a loss and win over each other. Someone was going to get voted behind a team they beat head-to-head. Briles did probably vote strategically to ensure his major in-state competitor didn't get a chance to play for a title, but that neither compares to this current situation nor discredits his argument for Baylor getting into the playoffs over TCU.
Posted by trackfan
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2010
19691 posts
Posted on 12/7/14 at 8:02 am to
quote:

This is dumb.

The 2008 B12 had a 3-way tie among Texas, Oklahoma and Texas Tech for the division with all three owning a loss and win over each other. Someone was going to get voted behind a team they beat head-to-head. Briles did probably vote strategically to ensure his major in-state competitor didn't get a chance to play for a title, but that neither compares to this current situation nor discredits his argument for Baylor getting into the playoffs over TCU.

You're conveniently ignoring the fact that Texas Tech had two losses, so they weren't even part of the discussion, just like West Virginia isn't part of the discussion today, despite beating Baylor. Texas and Oklahoma both had one loss, just like Baylor and TCU today, so the debate was always between them only. What's dumb is thinking a two-loss Texas Tech could have ever been ranked higher than a one-loss Texas or Oklahoma.
This post was edited on 12/7/14 at 8:04 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram