Started By
Message

re: Pelicans zeroed in on PG Gal Mekel

Posted on 12/4/14 at 4:20 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61569 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 4:20 pm to
quote:

Monty wanting corporate knowledge does not explain Salmons v. Casspi.


Salmons vs. Casspi was not ever a decision. Casspi was on a minimum contract that would have been acquired via trade. Salmons was a FA signing to a much larger than minimum exception a few weeks after the aforementioned trade went down, and after being turned down by at a minimum Richard Jefferson and Alan Anderson.

If the Pelicans thought they could get someone better than Casspi with the Room Level Exception, which doesn't seem an unreasonable assumption considering Casspi was on a minimum deal, then the decision was that Miller and Babbit would make better backups than Casspi to the better SF they could acquire with a $2.7 million exception. Therefore bad players with Corporate Knowledge deemed > Omri Casspi
Posted by Galactic Inquisitor
An Incredibly Distant Star
Member since Dec 2013
15274 posts
Posted on 12/4/14 at 5:22 pm to
quote:


Salmons vs. Casspi was not ever a decision.


Should it have been?

quote:

and after being turned down by at a minimum Richard Jefferson and Alan Anderson. 


It was a pretty bad miscalculation. Was there any reason we had to cut Casspi when he did?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram