- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Crowell or Blount?
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:18 pm to TeddyPadillac
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:18 pm to TeddyPadillac
Well Crowell is still battling west for carries and west actually got a couple more yesterday. It's understandable that if the Pats use the passing game vareen will get more snaps but blount looked good. If gray wasn't in the mix Blount would be a solid play imo. Idk I was leaning Crowell I just have the feeling blount will be solid too and get more RZ opportunities. Just throwing it out there.
2
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:21 pm to RedElephants
Even with this argument, Crowell makes more sense. Only two RBs in Cleveland.... And 3 in NE. Roll with both if need be, but Crowell will get carries. Can't say the same about Blount (just see what happened to gray)
Posted on 11/24/14 at 1:22 pm to RedElephants
Blount can be much more valuable than Crowell if Belichick would stick to a lead back. Blount showed last year he's RB2/lower RB1 range at the end of last season. Just hard to trust a RB every week especially when all it takes is a fumble to get taken out the game.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News