Started By
Message

re: Do you have a problem w/ a bank having a no gun policy?

Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:31 pm to
Posted by bapple
Capital City
Member since Oct 2010
11914 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

SabiDojo


I think there's a distinction that needs to be made.

1. Should Joe Blow, legally licensed, be legally allowed to carry in your bank?

2. If you own a bank, should you allow your employees to carry?

I think disbarring Joe Blow from carrying does no good for anyone.

In the case you describe, I can understand the insurance policies and subsequent shite storm from an employee legally carrying and shooting a perp in your bank.

Do I agree with it with my own belief system? No. Do I think private banks should be able to make their own policies with their own employees? Yes. A private business can do what it wants.

Do I think that there should be a LAW (read, not a "policy") barring the carry of firearms in a bank? Well, you know how well laws work against the average criminal...
Posted by SabiDojo
Open to any suggestions.
Member since Nov 2010
83953 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:37 pm to
My argument is for both customers and employees.
Posted by blackmamba
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2011
765 posts
Posted on 11/20/14 at 3:38 pm to
Bank tellers are instructed to give up the money and include the dye pack if possible. The money is insured and the bank would rather avoid someone dying in the branch. I have absolutely no problem with it.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram