Started By
Message

re: Which QB Was Better?

Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:03 pm to
Posted by GeauxTigerTM
Member since Sep 2006
30596 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:03 pm to
quote:

Marcus Randall (2004, Sr) 102-162, 63%, 1,269 yards, 9 TDs, 6 INTs


And yet Nick still would not play Russell over him. Talk about mismanaging the QB situation and not playing the younger guy with eyes on the future...
Posted by Mr. Wayne
Member since Feb 2008
10050 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:07 pm to
quote:

And yet Nick still would not play Russell over him.


Removing my ill conceived point due to Mike Linebacker completely shattering any logic that I thought was behind it with a post further down the thread.
This post was edited on 11/18/14 at 2:29 pm
Posted by c on z
Zamunda
Member since Mar 2009
127476 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

And yet Nick still would not play Russell over him. Talk about mismanaging the QB situation and not playing the younger guy with eyes on the future...



Was the Florida game that year a factor into that?
This post was edited on 11/18/14 at 2:08 pm
Posted by Mike Linebacker
Texas
Member since Sep 2009
3404 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 2:13 pm to
quote:

And yet Nick still would not play Russell over him.


Russell played in 11 games. He went 73-144 (50.7%) for 1,053 yards, 9 TDs and 4 INTs.

In contrast, Harris has "appeared" in 8 games, going 25-45 (55.6%), for 452 yards, 6 TDs and 2 INTs.

From the above, you can credibly argue that Randall > Jennings and yet Russell got at least 4x the playing time that Harris is getting.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram