Started By
Message

Ben Tate We should Should We?

Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:26 am
Posted by Chad504boy
4 posts
Member since Feb 2005
166480 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:26 am
Waived by browns. Wow.

Posted by Swagga
504
Member since Dec 2009
16194 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:28 am to
We should should not. Ingram is running like a man this year, we dont need another running back for CSP to give his carries to.
Posted by KindaRaw
Member since Jun 2014
3963 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:33 am to
quote:

Waived by browns

Holy shite. We need to jump on this. Could be good for us in the coming years if Ingram takes bigger money elsewhere.
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:41 am to
Not that this is the end all, but PFF has Tate near the very bottom of HBs this season, at -9.0.
This post was edited on 11/18/14 at 10:41 am
Posted by Doug_H
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Sep 2013
2288 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:48 am to
If CSP/Loomis don't think they'll re-sign Ingram and IF they think there's a chance that they move on from Pierre in the offseason then I'd say yes....But unless both of those things happen then no.....Tate is a pretty good all purpose back, him teaming up with Khiry Robinson in the backfield would be a pretty good combo, but putting Tate in their to mix in with maybe Ingram plus Robinson plus PT then that would just be too much
Posted by Hoodoo Man
Sunshine Pumping most days.
Member since Oct 2011
31637 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:48 am to
Pretty sure he's running at 3.1 ypc.
Posted by SnoopALoop
Nashville
Member since Apr 2014
4402 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:50 am to
Adrian Peterson would look average behind this o-line. I know you know that, but I have to keep reminding myself too.
Posted by The Sad Banana
The gate is narrow.
Member since Jul 2008
89498 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:54 am to
The Saints are extremely thin at RB right now and Ingram is an offseason decision they need to make. Why not see if you can get Tate in on the cheap as a try out? I see nothing wrong with this.
Posted by REG861
Ocelot, Iowa
Member since Oct 2011
36440 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 10:56 am to
not a position of particular need
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
16460 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 11:33 am to
Saints shouldn't touch him. One of the reasons is he is out is because of his constant complaining of having to share touches and the RBBC approach Clev uses.
Posted by pellietigersaint
Tiger Stadium
Member since Aug 2005
19043 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 12:04 pm to
holy sheeite. he just scored 20 points for me in fantasy like 3 weeks ago
Posted by CM84
Louisiana
Member since Nov 2007
2603 posts
Posted on 11/18/14 at 1:22 pm to
Pretty sure he wouldn't. I would think he ends up with the Colts. Where he's needed and has more opportunity. Not a backup or in a log jam in new Orleans.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram