Started By
Message

re: Saints -4 next MNF against Ravens

Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:09 pm to
Posted by Zipfer2022
Member since Nov 2011
3736 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:09 pm to
quote:

the_watcher


quote:

So you lied about the betting the game yourself and you lied about the line was then when this was pointed out you justify it by saying it is essentially the same thing as pick em while deflecting how wrong you were. And I need help with NFL betting?


You're so sure of yourself how about a ban bet? If you accept I will post my bet at 5:45 when I get home from work. If you don't want to do a ban bet I guess you will just never know...

How sure of yourself are you now, buddy?
Posted by DelU249
Austria
Member since Dec 2010
77625 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:14 pm to
also, the line will move...it's going to end up being even lower.
Posted by the_watcher
Jarule's House
Member since Nov 2005
3450 posts
Posted on 11/17/14 at 1:24 pm to
You said the line wasn't -2 but pick em. You said you bet it. Both of these were lies. It was -2. You have already confirmed this. After being caught in said lie you say you bet live in game odds at pick em -130. So when you originally said you bet the saints and the line was pick em everyone was just supposed to assume you meant that you bet the Saints at live in game odds at a line different than the game line? Even though after you were originally corrected you stood by your first stance (which was completely false) that the game line was pick em. What do I need to prove here?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram