- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Why wasn't it first and goal in OT?
Posted on 11/12/14 at 7:14 am to Miya9145
Posted on 11/12/14 at 7:14 am to Miya9145
I don't get why people don't understand this. The play happened after a play that resulted in a first down and it was a dead ball penalty. Once the ball was pushed back outside the 10 it was no longer first and goal.
2
Posted on 11/12/14 at 7:22 am to PurpleAndGold86
This just shows you the football acumen of most posters. Either they are new fans or just never bothered to learn the rules.
Posted on 11/12/14 at 7:48 am to PurpleAndGold86
quote:
The play happened after a play that resulted in a first down and it was a dead ball penalty. Once the ball was pushed back outside the 10 it was no longer first and goal.
quote:
I don't get why people don't understand this
Cuz what you said does not make sense.
Run a play. Get First and goal at the 1. Dead ball. Personal foul. 15 yard penalty. Should it not be First and goal at 16. This is what he is asking.
ETA: If this is a new rule just say so. But saying "new set of downs had not been established yet" is bullshite. That's the definition of a dead ball.
This post was edited on 11/12/14 at 7:51 am
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News