Started By
Message

re: After Bama, where are all those supporting Miles' offensive philosophy?

Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:50 am to
Posted by TH03
Mogadishu
Member since Dec 2008
171080 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:50 am to
philosophy was good. execution was not. it's as simple as that.

when you have open receivers and you throw them shite passes or they drop easy completions, you can't fault the philosophy.
Posted by Honkus
Member since Aug 2005
51574 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:56 am to
quote:

philosophy was good. execution was not. it's as simple as that. 




This.. game plan was great. Players need to execute.
This post was edited on 11/9/14 at 11:56 am
Posted by marklsu
New Orleans
Member since Sep 2008
1476 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 11:58 am to
The philosophy of conservative-run based/strong defensive play is very sound. It probably works 70-80% of the time. But when you square up against another team on your level, who has a long history of excelling. You need that extra dimension.

We need a better coaching from Cameron and Adam Henry. A credible air game must be present. Something we can fall back on since we run 70%+ of the time, that remaining 30% has to be clutch.

Is it QB coaching? Recruiting? Philosophy of sticking a dual threat QB into a Pro style offense? Play calling when we decide to pass?
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 11/9/14 at 12:32 pm to
quote:

philosophy was good. execution was not. it's as simple as that.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram