- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Steve Shaw - Head of SEC Officials - BAMA Grad
Posted on 11/8/14 at 6:35 am to Chris Warner
Posted on 11/8/14 at 6:35 am to Chris Warner
I really do think the SEC officials protect Bama. This is the only conspiracy theory I believe and I believe in it because there is so much evidence pointing to it.
The tipping point was 2009 when bama was undefeated and Patrick Peterson made that interception. On the field I can see how an official might've missed it although it looked like an interception even when I was watching live. But it was inexcusable when the replay guy said out of bounds. There were so many anglesthat showed it was clearly an interception without an ounce of doubt in the world. Bama would make a field goal on that drive and put the game out of reach. I think LSU would've won that game and Bama would not have won the national championship at that game been called fairly. There were several other really bad calls in that game if you willremember. And all went against LSU
The tipping point was 2009 when bama was undefeated and Patrick Peterson made that interception. On the field I can see how an official might've missed it although it looked like an interception even when I was watching live. But it was inexcusable when the replay guy said out of bounds. There were so many anglesthat showed it was clearly an interception without an ounce of doubt in the world. Bama would make a field goal on that drive and put the game out of reach. I think LSU would've won that game and Bama would not have won the national championship at that game been called fairly. There were several other really bad calls in that game if you willremember. And all went against LSU
This post was edited on 11/8/14 at 6:37 am
5
Posted on 11/8/14 at 6:38 am to runningTiger
quote:
think LSU would've won that game and Bama would not have won the national championship at that game been called fairly.
No. We would have gone 3 & out most likely after that int. Bama's D dominated out offense that game.
Posted on 11/8/14 at 7:49 am to runningTiger
Equally bad as the Peterson non-interception was the block in the back at the line of scrimmage that sprung Julio Jones on that long TD pass. It was blatant. The OLineman shoved our DB down with two hands in the back right when Julio was making his cut. Should have been a penalty instead of a backbreaking TD.
Posted on 11/8/14 at 7:55 am to runningTiger
quote:
There were several other really bad calls in that game if you willremember. And all went against LSU
Block in the back that sprung jones to a td.
Posted on 11/8/14 at 7:58 am to runningTiger
quote:
I really do think the SEC officials protect Bama.
Everyone points to a play here or there in largely unimportant games where the call was against us, but nobody objectively weighs it against the calls that we get in incredibly important games at incredibly important times.
Do you really think that Eric Reed interception during the 9-6 game would have been called against Bama if the refs were on their side? With everthing on the line?
This post was edited on 11/8/14 at 8:02 am
Posted on 11/8/14 at 10:34 am to runningTiger
quote:
I really do think the SEC officials protect Bama.
I am inclined to agree with this. It makes so much sense. It would not surprise if LSU had to overcome one or more really bad calls and several "questionable" calls in critical situations.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News