- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Lowell Narcisse (2017) receives LSU offer
Posted on 11/19/14 at 4:34 am to RiverParishLegend
Posted on 11/19/14 at 4:34 am to RiverParishLegend
quote:
He won't play QB in the SEC unless it's at Auburn. He is a WR anywhere else. He isn't bad at QB, but he can make a lot more money at WR.
Didn't Texas tell Manziel and RG3 that they'd be better at DB? Only Oregon and a few small schools looked at Mariota as a QB. It's kind of crazy for people to already decide this guy's college future as a sophomore in high school. I mean look at Boykin from TCU. They finally switched their offense coordinator, and look at his stats. Tannehill went from playing WR (because TAMU turned him into a WR) to playing QB and now is playing QB in the NFL.
I say you at least try these guys out at QB early on before deciding to switch them to WR.
This post was edited on 11/19/14 at 5:39 am
Posted on 11/19/14 at 7:13 am to Datbayoubengal
quote:Thank You! spot on.
Datbayoubengal
I will note that the schools you are talking about (Oregon, TAMU under Sheerman or Sumlin) are adaptable. They will at minimum tweak the system/plays to fit players. Texas and you know who not so much (at least recent history).
We don't free agency, can't go out and pick up the guy "for your system". Half the time recruiting the one that fits perfectly won't work either because of time/practice limitations.
Popular
Back to top
![logo](https://images.tigerdroppings.com/images/layout/TDIcon.jpg)