Started By
Message

re: Is DirecTV really bragging about "99% signal reliability" in their commercials?

Posted on 11/6/14 at 10:41 am to
Posted by GrammarKnotsi
Member since Feb 2013
9382 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

Is DirecTV really bragging about "99% signal reliability" in their commercials?



As opposed to..? I'm not on any side here, but I have had antenna, dish, direct, U-verse and Cox...None of them have 100% reliability
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28712 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 10:54 am to
quote:

As opposed to..? I'm not on any side here, but I have had antenna, dish, direct, U-verse and Cox...None of them have 100% reliability

I'm just saying there's a whole lot of improvement to be made between 99 and 100%, and 99% seems, to me, to be the bare minimum reliability to even be called acceptable service, and not something to brag about in a commercial.
Posted by SG_Geaux
Beautiful St George
Member since Aug 2004
78072 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 2:43 pm to
quote:

None of them have 100% reliability


While true, I have never had Cox go out because it was raining hard. Happened all the damn time on satellite.
Posted by TigerTatorTots
The Safeshore
Member since Jul 2009
80803 posts
Posted on 11/6/14 at 6:50 pm to
quote:

As opposed to..? I'm not on any side here, but I have had antenna, dish, direct, U-verse and Cox...None of them have 100% reliability

I have had Uverse for 3 years and have never not had the TV work when I turned it on. For me, they are 100% reliable
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram