- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Who are the gits who rejected Amendment 12
Posted on 11/5/14 at 3:38 pm to hunt66
Posted on 11/5/14 at 3:38 pm to hunt66
quote:
For me it had more to do with the not wanting to set a guaranteed number from a region, I would not have supported a guarantee number for any region, including south La FWIW, but there was no option for that.
Follow me...
South Louisiana is guaranteed 3 of 7 seats. That's how it's been for years. The remaining 4 can come from other areas. Right now 6 of the 7 members are from South Louisiana.
This Amendment wanted to mandate that 2 of the 4 at large should be guaranteed to N. LA, leaving 2 at large spots and the original 3 from S. LA.
They wanted a guaranteed change in committee make up as you can see the deck is currently stacked with 6 of 7 coming from S. LA.
2
Posted on 11/5/14 at 3:43 pm to Clyde Tipton
I think one seat is about right. How many people does it take to manage a bunch of fields?
Posted on 11/5/14 at 3:47 pm to Clyde Tipton
quote:
Clyde Tipton
I have followed it from the beginning and understand the way it is, as well as what was proposed. There is nothing in the current set up that restricts or precludes any North LA Representation for 4 of the 7 seats. I know what they wanted - I just voted no to it.
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News