Anyone who says any Call of Duty game after CoD 4 is either too young to remember CoD Finest Hour- CoD 3...
or
They just never played the good ole games. Call of Duty 4 was a really good and innovative game (at the time). Ever since then, they've thrown in all kinds of bs. Especially as of late. "Hey. Spend $1 per camo for new camos!!!!"

To answer the question, basically, CoD 2, CoD 2: TBRO, and CoD 3... Don't really change anything. Maybe add some dedicated servers and we'll call it a day.

I do play every Call of Duty they release... But I'm never truly satisfied. I miss the CoD 2/3 days from 360. Where you didn't have 5 year olds screaming into the mic and saying "I PWNED U NOOB! I FRICKED UR MUTHER!"

Maybe add in zombies. I've had countless nights where I'll have buddies over.. We'll just drink and play Zombies until we sleep

This post was edited on 10/30/14 at 12:40 am

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by Blitzed

Member since Oct 2009

21326 posts

Posted on 10/30/14 at 10:42 am to MeetTheFarkers

I've played those and meh. Socom was actually popping around that time and it was king. Had socom kept to its core it still would be for the serious gamer(Your counter strike for the console). The kids screaming now would still be screaming had they been able to play those CoD as well. MW2 was the peak of its success at the time and it made money, so why fix what ain't broke.

I don't understand the hate for the more recent ones. They have kept to that formula that made MW2 so successful which many here enjoyed, granted shitty maps on MW3. Say you are tired of the game or have no one to play with, kids screaming have made it unplayable, etc. but it's been the same game since MW2.

0 ...

Report Post

Gaming Board - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board