re: The committee knows what they are doing and I hate it

quote:

---

quote:
It could be the case, but I also think they know the scenario is unlikely. No way they set it up can guarantee 4 conference champs in short of making it a requirement The question in this scenario becomes, when they say they are putting huge emphasis on conference championships do they mean it




I am of the opinion that they mean it and that they will put a 1 loss conference champ in over a 1 loss SEC non champ

---

i think you are right...they are putting a major emphasis on conference champions, its kept other conferences out of the big games in the past when upsets have happened but not ours yet....could happen this year with Georgia...Trying to make our strength of the past (conference title game) our weakness for the future...I cant stand the 4 team playoff, its too few a teams...has to be a minimum of 6-8 for it to work I think it should be the power 5 champs get automatic bid and then 3 at large....8 is a nice even number, id even go with seven, highest rank conference champ gets a bye...doesnt matter to me...But I do think there will be some fireworks at the end of the year..LSU, Arkansas gonna ruin someones season...haha.....And I think Georgia pulls the upset in the SEC title game...