Started By
Message

re: Ole Miss SHOULD be over BAMA.. But OK over LSU?

Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:53 pm to
Posted by hobo with a rolex
everywhere
Member since Sep 2006
3203 posts
Posted on 10/28/14 at 8:53 pm to
I was thinking the same thing, our win over a top 4 team is easily better than any of OKs wins and our losses are to 2 teams ranked in the top 4

I don't get being ranked behind them either

Why is the fact that Auburn and MS would be 2 losses for just about every team in the top 25 ever brought up.

Why say Michigan State for example is better than LSU if you think Auburn and MS would be losses for Michigan State. (clearly they think that are they wouldn't be ranked ahead of them)

It makes the argument for not playing a hard schedule a legitimate one, why play a top school if a loss to a top school is worse than just not playing anybody.
Posted by Meldedee
Louisiana
Member since Dec 2011
3319 posts
Posted on 10/28/14 at 9:37 pm to
my point AND they have only won 5 games AND YES, they also have cupcakes
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram