Started By
Message

re: Question regarding Jennings vs Harris

Posted on 10/26/14 at 9:22 pm to
Posted by coondaddy21
Louisiana
Member since Oct 2012
3222 posts
Posted on 10/26/14 at 9:22 pm to
Defense played exceptional, so not much offense was needed. Granted, offensively, LSU beat itself with the turnovers and they left a lot of points out on the field but if the defense wasn't on its A game, can anyone say that if we had to pass, we would of been effective with Jennings in the game?

My only point is if this team is going to continue to have a pass to run ratio of 65-75%, isn't the better passing QB a better option to sell the threat of a pass, which would make running more effective? I also believe that Harris is a better passer, so if you have to pass, I would rather have him in the game than Jennings.

This is just my observation and nothing more. I am happy with the teams success but I believe its a legit discussion.

Posted by FourthQuarter
Member since Sep 2014
2228 posts
Posted on 10/26/14 at 9:52 pm to
quote:

Granted, offensively, LSU beat itself with the turnovers and they left a lot of points out on the field

What does this mean?
Posted by dgnx6
Baton Rouge
Member since Feb 2006
68930 posts
Posted on 10/26/14 at 10:20 pm to
quote:

My only point is if this team is going to continue to have a pass to run ratio of 65-75%,


We weren't doing that at the beginning of the year and lost 2 games. We started Harris, ran out of the two te formation once, lined up in shotgun majority if the game and got an arse beating. I don't care if we run it 98% of the time. Just win.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram