Started By
Message

re: How were German armored divisions so much more elite than their US counterparts

Posted on 10/25/14 at 12:21 pm to
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
89620 posts
Posted on 10/25/14 at 12:21 pm to
quote:

"Despite highly ballyhooed emphasis on employment of mechanized forces and on rapid movement, the bulk of German combat divisions were horse drawn throughout World War II."


As a member of the US Army Reserve, it would be remiss of me to not point out our role in the advantage the U.S. held in motorization in WWII.

Around the time of WWI - there was still horse cavalry, of course, but it was a clearly dying combat branch. The tank and armored car saved it and the branch continued doing what it was doing with the new tools. Transport (particularly tactical and operational) was still mainly horse drawn (or worse, soldiers on foot and handcarts) for many armies through WWII. The Germans were notorious for loading up the elite units with everything and leaving the filler units with the scraps.

In the United States, with the formation of the Army Reserve, there was a choice to be made - you see - every day the Good Lord sends, a horse has to eat, drink water, be groomed, walked, shoed, etc. So, the USAR could keep horses that had to be fed every day, or go with motor vehicles that only had to be fueled and maintained at irregular intervals for a reserve unit's schedule. Detroit wasn't complaining, as it was relatively young then. The regular army was small they would be damned if the reservists were all going to be motorized and they weren't, so - boom - there we were, about 30 years ahead of most other armies in that capacity.

This post was edited on 10/25/14 at 12:23 pm
Posted by Clames
Member since Oct 2010
16636 posts
Posted on 10/25/14 at 4:29 pm to
quote:

Around the time of WWI - there was still horse cavalry, of course, but it was a clearly dying combat branch.


Not so much. My great-grandfather was CG at Ft. Riley during WW2 and I have reams of his personal documents. In them are numerous references to the transition to mechanized cavalry and how rapid it was, but while rapid mechanization for the European theater was the main effort, non-mech cavalry was still needed in the Pacific theater where mechanized units were being out maneuvered by Japanese horse-drawn artillery. Simply couldn't cope with the mud and terrain on the islands. So there was parallel development of mechanized and non-mechanized cavalry from the replacement centers.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram