- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Fournette vs Chubb
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:53 pm
i wanna state that i think fournette obviously has the higher ceiling and id take fournette all day BUT:
Nick Chubb has been tearing it up for georgia. he runs extremly powerful, easily shedding would be tacklers, makes people miss in the open field, and has a knack for the big play.
he kind of reminds me of jeremy hill.
Who would you take?
Nick Chubb has been tearing it up for georgia. he runs extremly powerful, easily shedding would be tacklers, makes people miss in the open field, and has a knack for the big play.
he kind of reminds me of jeremy hill.
Who would you take?
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 9:55 pm
8
Posted on 10/23/14 at 9:56 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Both are very talented. Birth look outstanding overall. Too early to debate the two though.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:00 pm to la champ1
quote:
Both are very talented. Birth look outstanding overall.
thats the truth.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:01 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Chubb is a step ahead right now and i dont think there's any question
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:02 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
He reminds me of Ridley not Hill
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:03 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
One has a competent passing attack and runs against 6-7 man boxes most of the time. His coaches also do other things than run the ball when he's in the game. The other faces 8-9 and sometimes even 10 men in the box and has a very sub par passing attack. That's what separates them.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:05 pm to BobBarker
quote:
One has a competent passing attack and runs against 6-7 man boxes most of the time. His coaches also do other things than run the ball when he's in the game. The other faces 8-9 and sometimes even 10 men in the box and has a very sub par passing attack. That's what separates them.
Preach !
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:05 pm to BobBarker
quote:there are only 3 teams in the SEC that throw for fewer yards per game than LSU, and you managed to pick one of them to use as an example of a "passing attack".
One has a competent passing attack and runs against 6-7 man boxes most of the time. His coaches also do other things than run the ball when he's in the game. The other faces 8-9 and sometimes even 10 men in the box and has a very sub par passing attack. That's what separates them.
dont you dolts ever get tired of being so wrong, of saying the same stupid shite over and over and over, day after day after day. do you ever even check to see if any of it is true?
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 10:25 pm
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:05 pm to BobBarker
quote:
One has a competent passing attack and runs against 6-7 man boxes most of the time. His coaches also do other things than run the ball when he's in the game. The other faces 8-9 and sometimes even 10 men in the box and has a very sub par passing attack. That's what separates them.
Hutson Mason sucks, what separates the 2 is Chubb has been simply better so far.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:11 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Hutson Mason sucks
CMP 101 ATT 146 YDS 1022 CMP% 69.2 YPA 7.0 LNG 48 TD 10 INT 3 SACK 10 RAT 146.5
He is not great, but I wouldn't say he sucks either.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:12 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Hutson Mason sucks, what separates the 2 is Chubb has been simply better so far.
Not really. He's not a world beater, but he's reliable and seems to be getting better. He's definitely better than what we have right now.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:14 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Fournette easily. Geaorgia isnt having the box stacked for every play on off because people know they can sling it around.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:17 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:
Chubb is a step ahead right now and i dont think there's any question
LF doesn't have a decent passing attached k to back defenses off
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:19 pm to thunderbird1100
quote:and hes a fifth year senior who has played all 5 years
Hutson Mason sucks
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:21 pm to MastrShake
quote:Boom.
there are only 3 teams in the SEC that throw for fewer yards per game than LSU, and you managed to pick one of them to use as an example of a "passing attack".
dont you dolts ever get tired of being so wrong, of saying the same stupid shite over and over and over, day after day after day, without even wondering if its true or not.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:22 pm to SG_Geaux
quote:
CMP 101 ATT 146 YDS 1022 CMP% 69.2 YPA 7.0 LNG 48 TD 10 INT 3 SACK 10 RAT 146.5
He is not great, but I wouldn't say he sucks either.
He does absolutely nothing for their offense, I've been subjected to watching him many times.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:22 pm to JaxTiger10
Did you dolts not see the graph posted? Just goes to show people are just going to believe whatever the hell they want to believe regardless of facts. Reminds me of religious wingnuts.
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:23 pm to JaxTiger10
quote:
LF doesn't have a decent passing attached k to back defenses off
Except UGA's passing attack is WORSE
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:24 pm to Bert Macklin FBI
Fournette
Posted on 10/23/14 at 10:25 pm to Ducyborg
quote:
Georgia. . . people know they can sling it around.
quote:How are you idiots still posting this after MastrShake posted the SEC passing statistics, showing Georgia in second-to-last place?
LF doesn't have a decent passing attached k to back defenses off
ETA: I would take Fournette.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 10:27 pm
Page 1 of 2
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News