- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Does a quid pro quo exist that kept good rep. Senate candidates off the ballot?
Posted on 10/23/14 at 3:19 pm to redandright
Posted on 10/23/14 at 3:19 pm to redandright
Wasn't McCarthy going to run against Cantor anyway and they were all going to take a step up?
Or he planned to run against McCarthy regardless.
It was one of those two. He was planning to stick it out and rise in the ranking, either way. Cantor getting defeated just made it easier and expedited the process.
Or he planned to run against McCarthy regardless.
It was one of those two. He was planning to stick it out and rise in the ranking, either way. Cantor getting defeated just made it easier and expedited the process.
This post was edited on 10/23/14 at 3:20 pm
1
Posted on 10/23/14 at 3:25 pm to southernelite
quote:
Wasn't McCarthy going to run against Cantor anyway and they were all going to take a step up? Or he planned to run against McCarthy regardless.
I would have been surprised to see McCarthy running against Cantor.
quote:
Or he planned to run against McCarthy regardless.
Which I doubt he would have won.
quote:
He was planning to stick it out and rise in the ranking, either way. Cantor getting defeated just made it easier and expedited the process
Yep, and Scalise is just forty-nine, and is very bright, and well respected on the Hill. (According to my highly placed sources).
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News