Started By
Message

re: St. George organizers submit petition with signatures

Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:45 am to
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
73681 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:45 am to
quote:

All of this is probably moot because the entire parish of EBR would get to vote on that change.



You also had this in that post. Is this still correct?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 11:57 am to
quote:

All of this is probably moot because the entire parish of EBR would get to vote on that change.



You also had this in that post. Is this still correct?

Yes. Why do you ask?
Posted by LSURussian
Member since Feb 2005
126963 posts
Posted on 10/21/14 at 12:08 pm to
quote:

I thought they had stated yesterday that the vote comes down to just people residing in StG.
The link you provided to my post 3 weeks ago was discussing a new SG ISD, not the incorporation vote. Your lack of reading comprehension makes it very difficult to communicate with you.

Just like Baker, Zachary and Central had to do, a new SG school district would require approval by voters on a statewide and EBR basis to amend the state constitution to set up a new ISD. That also requires a 2/3 majority of the legislature to put such an amendment on the ballot.

Bodi White claims he has some super-clever way of avoiding a constitutional amendment but every attorney who has commented on his "no amendment needed" plan that I've seen (with the exception of Woody Jenkins who I'm not even sure is still a practicing attorney) disputes his opinion.

Basically if SG doesn't need a constitutional amendment to set up an ISD then why did Baker, Zachary and Central need an amendment?
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram