Started By
Message

re: Grand jury refuses to indict over botched SWAT raid that disfigured toddler

Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:15 pm to
Posted by Brightside Bengal
Old Metairie
Member since Sep 2007
3884 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:15 pm to
I would assume the family will still probably get millions in a civil suit, correct?
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
98329 posts
Posted on 10/8/14 at 10:17 pm to
quote:

I would assume the family will still probably get millions in a civil suit, correct?


Georgia, foreign sounding name, mom gets up on the stand and testifies in broken English. County's lawyer talks about 'tragic accident, no one at fault, protect our children from drugs, rabble rabble."

I wouldn't count on them getting a dime.
Posted by Eternally Undefeated
Member since Aug 2008
900 posts
Posted on 10/9/14 at 7:43 am to
Not necessarily. Law enforcement officers are shielded with an initial level of immunity protection. And, winning against a particular officer does not necessarily mean that you win against the department or the municipality. You almost have to prove intentional conduct or conduct so grossly reckless that it counters what just about any other law officer would do; or, in order to reach the department, you have to prove wholly inadequate training procedures.

However, it sometimes occurs in cases as extreme as this seems that settlements are reached in order to avoid public relation nightmares.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram