Started By
Message

re: 76 million chase accounts hacked

Posted on 10/2/14 at 4:57 pm to
Posted by TigerinATL
Member since Feb 2005
61582 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 4:57 pm to
From the official disclosure:

quote:

• User contact information – name, address, phone number and email address – and internal JPMorgan Chase information relating to such users have been compromised.

• The compromised data impacts approximately 76 million households and 7 million small businesses.

• However, there is no evidence that account information for such affected customers – account numbers, passwords, user IDs, dates of birth or Social Security numbers – was compromised during this attack.

• As of such date, the Firm continues not to have seen any unusual customer fraud related to this incident.

• JPMorgan Chase customers are not liable for unauthorized transactions on their account that they promptly alert the Firm to.

LINK

The question is, is internal information descriptive like "OT Baller" or do I need to get my mom to change her maiden name now?
Posted by GRTiger
On a roof eating alligator pie
Member since Dec 2008
63224 posts
Posted on 10/2/14 at 5:02 pm to
I imagine PAN and other account related information is stored on a completely isolated environment from general personal information. That is the best way to do it (for security and audit purposes), and is the only way I can think of that makes those statements true.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram