- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: lowe on picking up option for Rivers
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:44 pm to touchdownjeebus
Posted on 10/1/14 at 3:44 pm to touchdownjeebus
quote:
if we moved EG before the deadline, wouldn't it solve all of these problems and add possible assets?
Not necessarily. If you move Gordon for expirings and keep Asik and his $12 million hold, having Rivers on the books gives you about $12 million in cap space (assuming a $67 million cap). That's a decent amount cap space, but if you want to throw a max at a RFA like Jimmy Butler and hope Chicago doesn't match, Rivers contract would keep you from doing that.
There are only 2 potential downsides to not picking up Rivers' option. 1) He has a breakout year and you lose him because you sign a starter, kind of like how Morrow was a casualty of getting Asik. 2) It effects him mentally and he doesn't become a productive player. Those are negligible concerns, so it really does seem like a no brainer to not pick up his option.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 3:46 pm
Posted on 10/1/14 at 5:32 pm to TigerinATL
Thanks for the reply. I dunno where I read it, but there was an article out there that basically said moving EG would give us the ability to lock up Asik, Rivers, and the flexibility to keep Ryno.
I take that over adding another guy, imo.
I take that over adding another guy, imo.
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News