- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Connecticut State Representative arrested for voter fraud.
Posted on 9/30/14 at 11:41 am to SpidermanTUba
Posted on 9/30/14 at 11:41 am to SpidermanTUba
No, we don't have the technology to stop people from voting more than once on election day.
That is just a stupid comment.
And many more, like her vote in other peoples names, and still many more nursing home people who aren't cognitive of anything, vote as they are told.
If you can't make the voting booth on election day you don't need to vote. And yes, we should have a system that puts a hold on any vote that had voted twice, thereby the I.D. would be a deterrent because if a vald I.D. is used twice, then you know you have voter fraud, on the spot.
3
Posted on 9/30/14 at 11:54 am to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
No, we don't have the technology to stop people from voting more than once on election day.
That is just a stupid comment.
Seriously? quote:
And many more, like her vote in other peoples names
Like this guy:
LINK /
quote:
A complaint claimed that Monroe voted five times in Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) recalled election.
Gee - Voter ID laws must not have been in effect at the time - right? Or this could not have happened!!!
LINK
quote:
These recall elections were Wisconsin's first under provisions of a newly enacted law making two significant changes to the eligibility requirements for voting—photo ID and a longer residency requirement (from 10 to 28 days)—as well as the minor change of requiring electors to sign in on the poll book.[24]
OOOPS
Posted on 9/30/14 at 11:56 am to S.E.C. Crazy
quote:
No, we don't have the technology to stop people from voting more than once on election day.
That is just a stupid comment.
Seriously? quote:
And many more, like her vote in other peoples names
Like this guy:
LINK /
quote:
A complaint claimed that Monroe voted five times in Gov. Scott Walker’s (R) recalled election.
Gee - Voter ID laws must not have been in effect at the time - right? Or this could not have happened!!!
LINK
quote:
These recall elections were Wisconsin's first under provisions of a newly enacted law making two significant changes to the eligibility requirements for voting—photo ID and a longer residency requirement (from 10 to 28 days)—as well as the minor change of requiring electors to sign in on the poll book.[24]
OOOPS
quote:
, and still many more nursing home people who aren't cognitive of anything, vote as they are told.
So people in nursing homes don't have a right to vote - because you've made the amateur determination that they only vote as told?
quote:
If you can't make the voting booth on election day you don't need to vote
Guess that answers my question. My grandfather served from WW II through Vietnam and was in his right mind up until his death, but he shouldn't have been able to vote the last decade of his life. Got it.
quote:biometrics are a better way of doing this.
And yes, we should have a system that puts a hold on any vote that had voted twice, thereby the I.D. would be a deterrent because if a vald I.D. is used twice, then you know you have voter fraud, on the spot.
This post was edited on 9/30/14 at 11:58 am
Posted on 9/30/14 at 1:34 pm to S.E.C. Crazy
Fingerprint technology with a picture on the screen. How fricking hard is that? Geez they make everything a frickshow when they know for sure where it will end up, in technology's hands.
They don't WANT to solve the problem. The dems know good, honest, hard working humans have no problem having their I'd checked. They want the poor ignorant govt check cashiers to vote for the check and they don't WANT to have to identify them. There is NO other reason not to want I'd laws with prints attached. That way, if they frick up, everything with that print could be shut off immediately.....license, food stamps, etc.
Too fricking easy!
They don't WANT to solve the problem. The dems know good, honest, hard working humans have no problem having their I'd checked. They want the poor ignorant govt check cashiers to vote for the check and they don't WANT to have to identify them. There is NO other reason not to want I'd laws with prints attached. That way, if they frick up, everything with that print could be shut off immediately.....license, food stamps, etc.
Too fricking easy!
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News