Started By
Message

re: "Half the schools are below average" - not always true

Posted on 10/1/14 at 10:41 am to
Posted by CptBengal
BR Baby
Member since Dec 2007
71661 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 10:41 am to
quote:

You'll still assert the distribution of differences in performances of different schools is due entirely to random selection of students.


Distribution of differences in performance is NOT the same thing as the distribution of performances.


You can't even correctly describe what is being measured and analyzed.

It's pathetic.

You'll have to tell me when your defense is...I'll enjoy coming and peppering your idiocy with questions you won't be able to answer
Posted by SpidermanTUba
my house
Member since May 2004
36128 posts
Posted on 10/1/14 at 5:05 pm to
quote:


You can't even correctly describe what is being measured and analyzed.


Sure I can. We're measuring how many schools fall below average. Look at the OP. Its not that hard to grasp.

You're asserting that for large enough numbers of schools, half will fall below average. You are basing this on the central limit theorem which applies to random samples - however, the samples are not random, meaning you are wrong. (Not surprising from a guy who thinks ice has no mass.)



Clearly - if a state desired to - it could create a system whereby 90% of the schools performed below average - simply by putting 100% of the resources into 10% of the schools and putting 0% into the remaining 90%. It can do this regardless how many schools. You are asserting this isn't mathematically possible to do given a large enough number of schools. That's hilarious.
This post was edited on 10/1/14 at 5:11 pm
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram