Started By
Message

re: Crash at Burbank and E. Boyd

Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:44 am to
Posted by PigglyWiggly
Member since Feb 2010
1467 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:44 am to
quote:

While I agree with that, it's been long enough for people to know what to do there now. Can't blame it on the non functioning light still being up anymore.


It has been long enough to realize that the city needs to do something. The current set up is not working (amazing how many amateur traffic engineers were able to predict that). It simply is not safe to have a stop sign on a road as heavily used as Boyd where traffic has to cross 5 lanes.
Posted by LNCHBOX
70448
Member since Jun 2009
84304 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:47 am to
quote:

The current set up is not working (amazing how many amateur traffic engineers were able to predict that).


Because idiots you seem to want to give a pass for are too stupid to do what the signs and lights tell them.

quote:

It simply is not safe to have a stop sign on a road as heavily used as Boyd where traffic has to cross 5 lanes.


What dumb logic. If this was true, Siegen would have a light at every single intersection. But hey, at least you got the amateur part right.
Posted by Grit-Eating Shin
You're an Idiot
Member since May 2013
8435 posts
Posted on 9/30/14 at 9:49 am to
quote:

It simply is not safe to have a stop sign on a road as heavily used as Boyd where traffic has to cross 5 lanes.
Correct. You also can't try to change driver tendencies too drastically because this is what happens.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 1Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram