quote:
They also apparently believed that Jennings was the best QB to start this past Saturday. And, the Saturday before that.

I mean, ya know, since you're citing them.

And they now believe that Harris is the better QB to start because . . . Harris has started to play better. His performance in the Wisconsin game and the ULM game were poor. His performance in the past two games were excellent.

Can you not understand that a player can get better?

More specifically, can you not understand that a true freshman might not be the best choice for the first game of the season but might be the best choice for later in the season?

1 ...

Report Post

Posted by SettleDown

Everywhere

Member since Nov 2013

1333 posts

Posted on 9/29/14 at 1:21 pm to Salviati

quote:
And they now believe that Harris is the better QB to start because . .

4 year olds in preschool can figure that one out.

You were citing their ability to evaluate absent a goddamned knockout. I mean shite. If Saturday had been a boxing match, then Harris knocked Jennings out 2 seconds into the first round. shite man. Acting like they "figure it out" after that is retarded.

quote:
His performance in the Wisconsin game and the ULM game were poor.

His "performance" against Wisky was 3 plays.......his FIRST THREE PLAYS EVER.

Against ULM, he threw 2 f'n passes and Jennings STILL was highly mediocre against ULM.

quote:
Can you not understand that a player can get better?

Do you not understand the concept of one guy just being more talented than the other? And the reality that giving the starter reps to the lesser talented guy during the week means the more talented guy will be less prepared?

Nah. Guess not.

1 ...

Report Post

Tiger Rant - Replies to Post

Return To Board

Page 1

Return To Board